|
|
Post by fxtreme21 on Jun 19, 2016 17:50:22 GMT -5
Thanks for pointing that out ffelzitoga about #18. My vote is an overwhelming No.
Also, I am in UFFL VI. I took over some shitty team and I think I am finally turning it around.
|
|
|
|
Post by TDFFL Commish on Jun 19, 2016 20:40:44 GMT -5
Voting results:
RP #1 fails 1-5
RP #2 passes 5-1, 23 roster spots (effective start of 2016 season)
RP #3 fails 0-5
RP #4 fails 2-4
RP #5 fails 1-5
RP #6 fails 1-5
RP #7 fails 2-4
RP #8 fails 0-5
RP #9 fails 2-2
RP #10 passes 4-1 (effective 2017 season)
RP #11 fails 1-3
RP #12 fails 0-4
RP #13 passes 5-1 (effective immediately)
RP #14 fails 1-4
RP #15 passes 6-0 (effective immediately)
RP #16 passes 4-2 (effective 2017 season)
RP #17 fails 2-4
RP #18 fails 3-3
RP #19 passes 6-0 (effective immediately)
RP #20 fails 1-5
Did not vote: D. Clermont, T. Piazza
|
|
|
|
Post by TDFFL Commish on Jun 19, 2016 20:54:50 GMT -5
The following rule changes will go into effect immediately:
Owners can trade future draft picks (rounds 1-7 only) up to one season in advance. (i.e. trading 2017 draft picks during the 2016 season). Trading a future pick(s) will require the following payments:
Trading a future 1st round rookie pick = $50 non-refundable deposit before the trade is officially processed.
Trading any other rookie picks (Rounds 2-4) = $30 non-refundable deposit.
Trading any other rookie picks (Rounds 5-7) = $20 non-refundable deposit.
Deposits are not required if owners trade future picks for future picks and they are within one round unless one of the picks is a 1st round pick. For example, the following trade does not require a deposit: Player A and a 2017 2nd round pick for Player B and a 2017 3rd round pick. The following trade would require a deposit: Player C and a 2017 2nd round pick for Player D and a 2017 4th round pick.
These deposits will be applied to the following years league dues and in the event an owner leaves the league they will be used as discounts to help attract replacement owners.
If an owner trades for a 2017 1st rounder and it ends up being pick 1.04 (for example) and there is already a team with pick 1.04 then the Commish will roll dice to determine who gets pick 1.04 and who gets pick 1.05.
Allow trades to create invalid rosters. The team with the invalid roster would then need to drop or trade his extra players before a lineup can be submitted.
Add Offensive Recovery Fumble Recovery TDs = 6 pts each to the scoring.
The following rule changes will go into effect at the start of the 2016 season:
Increase the active roster size during the season from 20 players to 23 players.
The roster size during the off-season will be increased to 25 players.
The following rule changes will go into effect in 2017:
For TD 4, 5, and 6 only --> The order of round 2 is the same as the order of round 1 and the order of round 4 is the same as the order of round 3.
Returning owners can trade players and/or draft picks to a replacement owner for dispersal draft picks. Both owners must post the trade in the draft dispersal thread before the returning owner can select a player or rookie draft pick.
The following rule proposal can be resubmitted in 2017:
None
Any rule proposal that failed can be resubmitted in 2018.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Regulators on Jun 19, 2016 22:09:51 GMT -5
Sorry for the delay guys but below are my responses if still needed:
#1- No
#2 Yes, 23
#3- No
#4- Yes
#5- No
#6- No
#7- Yes
#8- Yes, 10
#9 Yes
#10- No
#11 Yes
#12- No
#13- No
#14- Yes
#15- Yes
#16- Yes
#17- Yes
#18- No
#19- Yes
#20- No
|
|
|
|
Post by ffelzietoga on Jun 19, 2016 23:46:54 GMT -5
Denim Chicken>>>
YES - 25 (22 players on the roster leaves too much talent in the waiver wire) YES - 30 (Voted yes to 25 in #2, but 30 seems better. Allows more of a challenge for teams and focuses on making sure all teams are paying attention throughout the season)
A LARGE roster size mean it's more of a "draft & hold" league -- you may get lucky in the summer/August or you may not;
but in-season (& beyond) [esp. if you don't have early good fortune], there's less you can do to counter-attack.
I would have thought that a LOWER (19-20) roster size would be more challenging.
Because you have to greatly weigh the value of every given roster slot -- and thus make some tough calls to cut players.
You'd have to become more aware of the changing values of the players, because there is SOME value "out there", and you don't want to miss out.
I would think that you'd WANT some value in the waiver wire (??) (it's never going to be "draft quality")
I would welcome Denim Chicken or others to comment on this. |
|
|
|
Post by TDFFL Commish on Jun 21, 2016 5:22:57 GMT -5
The league rules at all the sites have been updated.
Note: Even though proposal 13 indicated future draft picks (rounds 1-7) can be traded, the rules indicate rounds 1-5 because TD 4, 5, and 6 will have a 5 round draft starting in 2017.
|
|
